CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Working Split In A Contest Is Verboten!

To: "k9yc@arrl.net" <k9yc@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Working Split In A Contest Is Verboten!
From: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Reply-to: wa5rtg@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:44:05 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Not a great example...D4C was split on 160m when I worked him.  I am sure
he was working stations faster as a result although it was taking up 3 khz.

Stan, K5GO.

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
wrote:

> Today was the first time in a long time I've witnessed this very bad
> practice, bad because it dumps your callers on top of a dozen or more other
> running stations. Two stations did it Sunday afternoon, and one of them
> clobbered A35T. PULEEZE don't do this, guys.
>
> Good operators learn how to manage pileups without the crutch of split.
> The guys at D4C are a great example. They're always busy, but I'm nearly
> always able to get through by skillfully working around the pileup centered
> on their frequency, both because they're even more skilled at working it
> and because they have great ears. I ran QRP (5W) this weekend, and I'm in
> their log on four bands from NorCal. Not once did it take me more than a
> few calls WITH 5W!
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>