Not true. If the callsign and power given aren't valid for the
location, it's bogus.
Barry W2UP
On 2/22/2016 16:59, WW3S wrote:
well, if they dont submit a log, the qso’s shouldnt be removed.....they are not
a unique, since many worked them, be interesting to see how it gets handled....
On 2/22/2016 2:56:31 PM, Tom Hammond (thammond@chartermi.net) wrote:
Well, I admit that I fell prey to this, twice! www.qrz.com/db/gj0ke comes up
blank. Geesh...
I worked "them" on 15M at 18:04 and on 20M at 20:59. That means that "they"
were operating for at least 3 hours handing out bogus points. Who would do
such a thing? Why?
I passed through Jersey on a business trip once, and working them reminded
me of it. I wondered to myself why Jersey could run a KW while the rest of
the UK can only run 400W. I was had, but good.
I wonder if I would have caught ID0IOT or DU0PE (both poor examples, I
admit) in my oblivious state.
I'm feeling seriously disappointed by my fraternal brethren, and in myself a
bit.
Tom
K8BKM
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ron
Notarius W3WN
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 12:03 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Working Split In A Contest Is Verboten!
Speaking of things that are "verboten" in a contest (or should be)...
Under the category of WFWL, anyone else raise an eyebrow over "GJ0KE" ? I
caught him (or whomever it was using that call) on 15 CW on Saturday. The
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|