CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Working Split In A Contest Is Verboten!

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Working Split In A Contest Is Verboten!
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:06:58 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I find it interesting, reading all these E-Mails, where I agree as it seems 90% say never during a contest. What I can not believe is the 10% that say it is OK, but then in the very next message they complain about Key Clicks. Key Clicks are horrible, yet it's just fine to take up twice as much band-with for ONE station by running split?
Running Narrow by NOT running split is very easy to do.
Running Narrow by NOT having Key Clicks, not so much.
I honestly If i had bad Key Clicks I right now honestly do not know what I would do to lessen them. Honestly. I grew up with old boatanchors, that some had clicks and some diddn't. many had HIGH voltages at the contacts of that straight key. You would see sparks when youre transmitting. If you had bad clicks you added some R & C across the contacs, and it helps and even removed them all sometimes. Now on this old TS-430S if it had bad clicks, not a clue what to do about it.

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 2/22/2016 7:56 PM, Tom Haavisto wrote:
I think there are times when good judgement and common sense need to be
taken into account, and there are times when running split is the only way
to manage things.  I worked 4W/K1YC, and had he NOT been running split, he
would have quickly lost control of the pileup.  He was NOT loud, but quite
copyable.

No - I don't recommend running split in a contest, but had he not run
split, he may as well have went QRT as his only other viable option.  I
think he also exercised good judgement by operating high in the band

Tom - VE3CX


This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email>
<#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Alan M. Eshleman <doctore@well.com> wrote:

Agree.  The incident in question here is 4W/K1YC (9V1YC) on, if I recall
correctly, 15 M.  9V1YC is a great op.  He chose a spot way up the band and
a very narrow (1 KHz) split.  He still had the problem of extracting calls
from the pileup and the callers had a much easier time knowing when he had
come back to him.  I certainly don't recommend this as standard contest
procedure, but in this case it worked.

With respect to K9YC: congratulations to Jim for a fabulous QRP effort in
the contest.  I'll bet he finishes way up in the standings.

73,

Alan/K6SRZ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tree" <tree@kkn.net>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 10:20:41 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Working Split In A Contest Is Verboten!

I disagree with the idea that operating split during a contest is
Verboten.

Working split is something that is done to react to a specific set of
circumstances - and I don't see the difference between being in a contest
or not.

The set of circumstances is pretty intuitive.  If you have a pileup and
people you come back to are not hearing you because of the pileup.  One of
the things that helps enable this is propagation.

I have used split during a contest exactly twice.  You do need to be aware
of the impact it can have on QRM - and in both cases - I took steps to
mitigate it.

One of these came while operating from UA0C during the Friendship Radio
Games.  I was essentially a special event station and the European pileup
was having a hard time hearing me come back to them.   This really wasn't
what most people think of as a contest - but going split gave me an
advantage that eventually resulted in a gold medal.

The other time was at KL7RA on 10SSB during a CQ WW SSB contest - when we
had a marginal opening to Europe and a MASSIVE pileup.  I ended up on
something like 29.200 MHz - and ended up going split because the Europeans
could not hear me over those who had to call over and over.  I actually
ended up with two pileups - one up 5 and the other up 10.

The whole point is to maximize the QSO potential of any situation.  In a
contest - you should do whatever you can to maximize your QSOs. (that is
within the rules and regulations of a contest).  I don't see where going
split crosses any ethical boundaries - especially when done on part of the
band that is not very crowded.

Tree N6TR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>