So what exactly is the purpose of the exchange? If it's getting in the way we
might as well get rid of it.
Rudy N2WQ
Sent using a tiny keyboard. Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate
autocorrect.
> On Jul 20, 2016, at 5:55 PM, Shelby Summerville <k4ww@twc.com> wrote:
>
> Rudy, with all due respect, IMHO making the exchange more difficult only
> discourages the "casual" participants, especially those that will send in a
> log?
> Those that don't send in their log, couldn't care less. Case in point: My CW
> is mediocre, at best, but I still get on during SSCW, just to give out some
> points. I know what I should be sending, as the exchange, but couldn't care
> less what they send to me, as I have no intention of submitting a log.
>
> C'ya, Shelby
>
> As I don't have an iPhone, nor an iPad, sent from my PC
>
> ---- Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
>> While the focus so far has been on scoring, let's not forget about the
>> current exchange, which requires zero skills. I'd like to propose an
>> alternative so that ops actually pay attention to what's being sent. Some
>> examples include the following:
> 1) Serial number2) Serial number plus the serial number of the previous QSO3)
> Grid locator plus the grid locator of the previous QSO
> The exchange should be something that cannot be pre-populated in a history
> file.
>
> Rudy N2WQ
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|