CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power
From: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 17:48:07 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I was wondering something similar.

I popped in and out of the RDXC a bit this year, just playing a little in 
between tasks that weekend, and trying out the feel of remote-control 
contesting.  I didn't even record the exchange information, much less submit a 
log.

Did my "very casual" participation cost actual competitors Qs?   

I get that there's an incentive for some contest judges to discourage folks 
from even thinking about padding their logs.  But if there's going to be a 
penalty, even if just a simple loss of a Q, because someone didn't send in a 
log, that fact really needs to be advertised around the time of the contest.

-- 
Michael Adams | mda@n1en.org

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
w2lc@twcny.rr.com
Sent: Thursday, 6 October, 2016 13:02
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power

Wow! You mean that the few casual QSO's I worked in RDXC over the years were 
not counted since I did not send in a log?

Sorry for the NILs or invalid QSO or whatever you want to call the removed 
QSO's 

Every fall I make a list of contests that I would like to operate if I have the 
time and inclination, RDXC will not be on that list.

73 Scott W2LC 
W2LC@arrl.org 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>