I'm changing the topic from "It's not the sunspots folks" to "DX Contest",
since the discussion changed from propagation to what constitutes a "DX"
contest.
If it's a DX contest that you desire, why not change the scoring system to be
based on the Maidenhead 2 x 1 degree grid square system that's used in the
VHF/UHF world? Logging software would have to be "enhanced" to perform a
real-time calculation of the great circle (short path?) distance between
stations. This way, DX is actually equal to distance, not some political border
/ boundary. Q's would be Q's, no matter where, but multipliers would be grid
squares, with a weighting based on distance that encourages or rewards "real
DX". This levels the playing field, doesn't it? Now San Diego can work Boston,
for more "DX value" than say London working Paris. It's DX you're trying to
encourage, right, not necessarily Q's?
This would remove the "advantage" that many are arguing Europeans have over
other parts of the world, or that the East Coast has over the West Coast. In
this contest, I could work people in my own city, my own state, my own call
area, but my DX score wouldn't be very good.
For example:
Score = Q's x grid square / distance value, where grid square /distance value =
0-1000 miles, 1 pt
1001-5000 miles, 2 pt
5001-10000 miles, 3 pt
>10,001 miles, 4 pt
Yep, log checking would be more complex, too, but of course it would be
automated. Anyone claiming a grid square is a greater distance that it actually
is would have a busted Q.
This scoring system still rewards hams in high population-density areas, so the
weighting would have to be non-linear. Essentially the contest would be less of
a DXCC entity contest and more of true world-wide (work anybody) contest with a
reward for longer-distance Q's.
Interested to hear the pros / cons of a DX contest structured this way. Pardon
me if there is already a contest (I'm not aware of) that is already scored this
way. I think the Stew Perry Top Band Challenge rewards DX Q's by distance, but
that's a one-band contest.
73, Tom
K8BKM
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|