To: | Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] signing TEST at the end...not so bad |
From: | Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Sun, 4 Dec 2016 18:08:29 +0000 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Sorry Mike, I disagree. I see that "TEST Call" works better, and gives more visibility, for time in tx. EVERY time, I tune across "test".. NOT followed by a callsign, I HAVE to wait.. to get the callsign.. and MANY MANY times. it simply is NOT worth the time. So.. I don't. IF they want me.. they can find me. I WILL find someone in that mult, that sends their call LAST.. or there are a whole lot of stations assigned the call "TEST" Have a great day, --... ...-- Dale - WC7S in Wy "Actions speak louder than words" 1856 - Abraham Lincoln _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] signing TEST at the end...not so bad, Mike Smith VE9AA |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] signing TEST at the end...not so bad, Kelly Taylor |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] signing TEST at the end...not so bad, Mike Smith VE9AA |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] signing TEST at the end...not so bad, Kelly Taylor |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |