>>> I don't think signing TEST at the end is such a big problem.
Is it really any kind of problem?
In relation to CW tests, which appears to be what is being discussed here, we
are looking at fractions of one second. It is fair to say that most contesters
send their cq's at 35wpm - given that is based upon 5 characters per word that
is 175 characters per minute, almost 3 characters per second including the gap
between the end of the call and the word 'TEST. A total delay of no more than
one third of a second!
If the only complaint we had to make about cw contesting is the suffixing of
the word 'Test' there would be a collective vast amount of high blood pressure
saved by contesters during events when we compare with real problems such as
non-ider's.
One third of a second is fine by me to determine that the sender is ready to
take respondents, jumping the gun by anticipation will waste more time in many
cases by a request for repeats.
73 Brian 5B4AIZ / C4Z.
From: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Sent: Monday, 5 December 2016, 17:32
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] signing TEST at the end...not so bad
I don't think signing TEST at the end is such a big problem. Just listen to
the whole sequence, as it prevents other problems as well.
I think long CQs, and CQs where you need 'quantum physics' reflexes to
answer in time, before a new sequence starts, much worse.
73 de Vince, VA3VF
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 10:43 PM, <john@kk9a.com> wrote:
>
> I seems like either way I need to hear the whole sequence before I can
> attempt to make a QSO. I prefer to end a CQ with my callsign and I have
> made
> many QSOs without even sending CQ or TEST, just my callsign.
>
> John KK9A - P40A
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|