I see the notation that this came from the April copy of CQ. There goes my
first three paragraphs! <g>
A lot of familiar or semi-familiar calls on that list.
I do have to wonder if any of the station(s) that Mike VE9AA & others have
had a legitimate concern about, WRT alleged or potential 'scrubbed' calls,
are on this list. If that allegation is true (not that I disbelieve them,
but so far we have only heard one side of the story), and the station(s)
involved are on this list, well, it does make one wonder of that in turn led
in whole or in part to the DQ.
73, ron w3wn
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
DXer
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 6:52 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Disqualified callsigns - CQ WW SSB contest.
I saw this on another list. Nothing on the CQWW Blog. Now I see it here:
http://dx-world.net/disqualified-callsigns-cq-ww-ssb-contest/
I find the following line disturbing: 'Reports suggest....'
Any reason it had to be made public this way? I don't fault the website, it
was a scoop.
We all want the CC to do its job, but why/how the info got out this way?
Somehow I doubt all these people volunteered the info they were
disqualified.
73 de Vince, VA3VF
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|