CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting explanation from CQWW blog

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting explanation from CQWW blog
From: Mark Bailey <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:56:14 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
And my point is that single operator categories should not be played on the 
internet.  Otherwise, as Rick observed, the final nail is in the coffin.

We have to accept some possibility of undetected cheating-as we do now for 
power categories.

73,

Mark

On April 17, 2017 9:47:54 AM EDT, Rich Assarabowski <konecc@snet.net> wrote:
>Mark:
>
>Don't get me wrong, I'm in favor of keeping the single-op category,
>always have been.    But prohibiting self-spotting in single-op
>unassisted means these enforcement issues will continue to hound us ...
>And if the rules are changed to allow self-spotting, how does one
>self-spot in single-op without the Internet?  
>
>That was my point.
>
>--- Rich K1CC
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: MARK BAILEY [mailto:kd4d@comcast.net] 
>Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 9:05 AM
>To: cq-contest@contesting.com; Rich Assarabowski
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting explanation from CQWW blog
>
>Hi Rich:
>
>I do not agree that forcing everyone who wants to compete onto the
>internet ("nail in the coffin for the single operator categories") is
>the right answer - I think we should retain single-operator categories.
>
>Clearly, the assisted and multi-operator categories will continue to
>move more and more on to the internet (self-spotting, social media,
>etc.).  There should continue to be single operator categories for the
>luddites like me who want the option to play on the radio - and these
>categories should prohibit self-spotting.
>
>There may be cheating that cannot be detected, similar to the situation
>with power cheating and remote receivers, but that is not a sufficient
>reason to eliminate categories.  Otherwise, we end up with a single
>category: "anything goes".
>
>73,
>
>Mark, KD4D
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>