CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 15:09:03 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
This is quite interesting.
Makes me think what are people kin K9CT doing and others that are using flex's
that this one Field Day site did not do when I got this comment a while ago,


There is a case from a Colorado Field Day operation where a Flex 6300 had to be removed and was replaced by an IC-706MkIIG! See attached PDF. The 6300 has no front end at all other than a high pass at 1.7 MHz and a low pass at 55 MHz.

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 5/22/2017 1:18 PM, Chuck Dietz wrote:
http://www.flexradio.com/amateur-products/flex-6000-signature-series/flex-6700/

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:38 PM, <w5prchuck@gmail.com> wrote:

They are still selling the 6700



Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10



*From: *Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
*Sent: *Monday, May 22, 2017 12:37 PM
*To: *xaxaxaxa yayayaya <cqtestk4xs@aol.com>
*Cc: *CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>
*Subject: *Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios



Hi Bill,



The 6500 is a discontinued model. It is replaced by the 6600.



The 6600 will do SO2R in a single box and has the new preselectors with

50dB of isolation between SCUs (an SCU is a flex term for a wideband

receiver).



As for comparing it to a K3S, that's a holy war you want to start here. :)

However on the Maestro or M series radios the display is larger, the knobs

are larger (on Maestro) and it has the panadapter built in. But I think

everything else is a matter of personal preference because the performance

is so high between those radios that to the average operator with the

average set of ears any difference is minor.



73

Ria, N2RJ



On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Bill via CQ-Contest <

cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:



At the hamfest last weekend I had some extra time Sunday and wandered
over

to the Flex radio site. and had a long sit down with one of the reps.  I
did a hands on with the 6500  and was truly impressed, especially with
how

"easy" it was on the ears.
I currently have a pair of K-3s for SO2R and have kicked around replacing
these with the 6500.  I know K9CT as well as a couple others who use the
Flex stuff.  I really would like to hear from them and others about these
radios and how they compare to the K-3s in a contesting and Dxing
situation...ease of use, operator friendly, audio quality for listening
as

well as transmit etc.  Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
Bill K4XS/KH7XS
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________

CQ-Contest mailing list

CQ-Contest@contesting.com

http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>