| To: | Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ? |
| From: | K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us> |
| Date: | Mon, 31 Jul 2017 09:26:47 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
One reason, I believe, for keeping the separate categories is that they result in completely different operating strategies, especially for those of us do a lot of searching and pouncing. This may not be obvious from just looking at the scores. 73, Scott K9MA ---------- Scott Ellington. K9MA --- via iPhone > _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ?, 4O3A Signature |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op?, Jim Brown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ?, Richard F DiDonna NN3W |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ?, Jim George |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |