CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A

To: <john@kk9a.com>, <rjairam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A
From: "tony.kaz--- via CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: tony.kaz@verizon.net
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:26:16 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
John,
That's correct. The load on the 13.56 MHZ water cooled amp may be >10k when the 
RF is first turned on. In milliseconds, when the plasma ignites the load can go 
to < 100 ohms, even below 10 ohms.  Easier to have the auto tuner preset for 
the low load since the time at high impedance is so short. Not too much 
groaning at 5KW with one transistor. 😊
And yes, sometimes they pop. Expensive to replace.

73,
N2TK, Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+tony.kaz=verizon.net@contesting.com> On 
Behalf Of john@kk9a.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 8:16 PM
To: rjairam@gmail.com
Cc: CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Elecraft KPA 1500 vs.OM 2000A

I have little RF amplifier knowledge however I believe that your 66:1 SWR 
comment is for pulsed service which has a much lower duty cycle than a typical 
amateur radio transmission, especially the popular FT8 mode.  A higher duty 
cycle with high SWR creates more heat that needs to be dissipated. A LDMOS can 
definitely fail, even on commercial amps with protection circuits.

John KK9A


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy 7 edge, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.


On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:32 PM rjairam@gmail.com <rjairam@gmail.com>
wrote:

> LDMOS itself does not require perfect SWR. The older MOSFETS did. 
> LDMOS do not. They can be operated at 66:1 SWR. This is a dead short at full 
> output.
> There are videos of them arcing with them and welding. Probably not 
> for extended duty cycle, but guess what- neither can your ceramic tube 
> amp with tubes made of unobtainium.
>
> The fragile parts in a solid state amp that are affected by high SWR 
> are the filter network, the capacitors and inductors.
>
> The software in modern amplifiers, if properly implemented will 
> absolutely protect your amplifier and antenna system. If you throw 
> high SWR it will shut down or fold back (de-rate).
>
> The KPA1500 has an internal antenna tuner that can handle up to 6:1 SWR.
>
> Other amplifiers such as the PGXL (which I have) can operate at high 
> SWR with no tuner. I can run mine at 2.5:1 with software derating. I 
> get about 1.3kw out of it at that high SWR. With about 3:1 SWR I can 
> do about 500w depending on the band. Beyond that I get a fault. With 
> 2:1 SWR I can do 1.5kW. There is a tuner being developed for that one 
> as well. I don’t abuse it and I try to run my antennas resonant. I’ve 
> had this amp since it was being alpha tested and run it through a variety of 
> antennas and duty cycle.
>
> I also ran an Alpha 91B so I have an idea of what a tube amp can do. 
> The solid state amps work well and in terms of SWR tolerance are pretty good.
> Elecraft and SPE did a very good thing by including built in antenna 
> tuners. The SPE implementation is excellent as it follows CAT. From my 
> limited use of the KPA1500 it seems To do the same thing.
>
> This is based on my actual experience and not assumptions.
>
> 73
> Ria, N2RJ
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 6:11 PM <john@kk9a.com> wrote:
>
>> Those are two completely different animals, one is lightweight and 
>> has LDMOS finals that need an antenna tuner or a perfect antena and 
>> the other uses a ceramic tetrode that can tolerate 3:1 SWR. A tetrode 
>> tunes differently than a triode but perhaps the auto tune takes care 
>> of this.  I am not sure if there is an OM power list but there is an 
>> Elecraft list where you can follow any issues or complaints that 
>> people may have.  Is quietness a concern? Is quickly setting it up 
>> without a lot of adjustments a concern?
>>
>> FWIW, I have used an Acom 2000A several times and basically I just 
>> plugged it in and it worked plus it's super quiet. The only issue I 
>> have saw with this amp is that it is sensitive to arcs in the antenna 
>> system.
>>
>> John KK9A
>>
>>
>>
>> K4XS wrote:
>>
>> Looking for a backup amp for the new station.  Probably going to run 
>> SO2R so auto-tune is important.  I'm running a K3S and the second 
>> radio will also be a K3S.  I really don't care if the amp "matches"
>> the K3S in looks.  Like most of you guys I'm concerned about 
>> performance.  Both rigs are equal in price.
>> Here's the question:  If you were buying a new amp and were buying it 
>> to satisfy the above criteria, which would you choose and why?
>> K4XS
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>