CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth

To: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth
From: Richard F DDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 13:29:53 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
That works for the assisted hams, but not everybody is assisted......

73 Rich NN3W

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:24 PM Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
wrote:

> I believe if people used the announcements portion of DX Summit and not
> the remarks as part of a spot, it would provide a bread crumb trail for the
> contest sponsors and not reward the offender with a spot.  However since we
> are talking CW and spots are supposedly meaningless in the world of
> skimmers, the spot shouldn't be viewed as having rate boosting value - my
> personal experience is that they still do but what do I know.
>
> Ed  N1UR
> ________________________________________
> From: CQ-Contest [cq-contest-bounces+edwards=
> sbelectronics.com@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Michael Adams [mda@n1en.org
> ]
> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2020 1:54 AM
> To: CQ Contest
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth
>
> I think that intentionally posting busted spots to the network is a bad
> idea.
>
> Perhaps making use of the classic spotting networks' announcement feature
> might work better ("WA1XYZ keyclicks 20m"), although I don't know that
> contest loggers are set up to easily make use of the announce functionality.
>
> But it would be a way to provide an automatically-logged way to register
> concern about a bad signal or other issues that doesn't reward the problem
> stations with the benefit of a spot.   The contest committee can grab such
> complaints from a node's logs, and check the band recordings when they
> become available.
>
> --
> Michael Adams | mda@n1en.org
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+mda=n1en.org@contesting.com> On
> Behalf Of K8MR via CQ-Contest
> Sent: Sunday, 7 June, 2020 17:03
> To: k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth
>
>  So bust his call in the spot, and then correct it in the comment field.
>
> 73  -  Jim   K8MR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>