TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 07:26:29 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Dennis,

When selective fading causes the carrier to drop far below the amplitude of the sidebands, reinserting a carrier with a BFO is a way to improve detection of the AM signal. This is not erroneous. The local oscillator(s) and BFO must be stable for this to work. They do not have to be accurate. It would be really nice if they could be controlled with a smaller resolution than 1 Hz for those of us who can hear the difference between a 1 Hz flutter (beat) and a slower beat. For most amateur operation this does not matter. I was only using this as an example of how most people CAN in fact tell the difference if the BFO cannot be adjusted in smaller than 10 HZ steps.

Yes a real syncrhronous detector is a better way to detect an AM signal with selective fading.

Ken N6KB


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>