| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] RE: Power Supply & Equip. grounding |
| From: | "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:33:10 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Sinisa should be commended for a logical and alternative view of the RF ground vs. ground rod issue! Of course, and a refreshing viewpoint, we should not depend on ground for part of our RF path at all! That is what using balanced antennas, such as a dipole or loop does, it gives us two equal conductors to launch RF into the ionospheric or ground wave path. Also, elevated radials, or vertical dipoles above ground improve the efficiency of the wave launching. That then leaves the protection function of the ground system which is easier to provide if RF in not in the path. Thank you Sinisa! 73 Stuart K5KVH |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] RE: Power Supply & Equip. grounding, ac5e |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [TenTec] PS grounding, John L Merrill |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] RE: Power Supply & Equip. grounding, Dr David L Kepkay |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] RE: Power Supply & Equip. grounding, Stuart Rohre |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |