-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of SS409SS@aol.com
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 6:41 AM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published
In a message dated 6/26/2004 11:44:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
nq5t@comcast.net writes:
>
> They DO seem to like it ..
>
> Grant/NQ5T
As we know, the ARRL likes the advertizing $$ as well. Just ask John Bee,
when we told him about the problems with the FT100 he weighed what was worth
more when deciding if he should inquire further. Guess what, the almighty
dollar took the front seat in his decision. In a nutshell, the ARRL is
flawed in its advertizing policies and ethics which makes them as credible
as the typical crackhead on the street IMHO.. If ICOM promises advertizing
in their magazine, they will comply with a less than honest review.. Want
proof, look at all of the lemons that made their way into the hamshacks of
the world that the ARRL gave rave reviews to..
Money talks and BS walks at the ARRL..
Stick with the Orion and be 7k ahead of the game and a whole lot happier
that you got what you paid for.. Regards fellow Ten Tec lovers.. Richy N2ZD
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|