TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published
From: SS409SS@aol.com
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:41:15 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
In a message dated 6/26/2004 11:44:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
nq5t@comcast.net writes:

> 
> They DO seem to like it ..
> 
> Grant/NQ5T


  As we know, the ARRL likes the advertizing $$ as well. Just ask John Bee, 
when we told him about the problems with the FT100 he weighed what was worth 
more when deciding if he should inquire further. Guess what, the almighty 
dollar took the front seat in his decision. In a nutshell, the ARRL is flawed 
in its advertizing policies and ethics which makes them as credible as the 
typical crackhead on the street IMHO.. If ICOM promises advertizing in their 
magazine, they will comply with a less than honest review.. Want proof, look at 
all of the lemons that made their way into the hamshacks of the world that the 
ARRL gave rave reviews to.. 

Money talks and BS walks at the ARRL..  

  Stick with the Orion and be 7k ahead of the game and a whole lot happier that 
you got what you paid for.. Regards fellow Ten Tec lovers.. Richy N2ZD
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>