| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published |
| From: | "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Sat, 26 Jun 2004 11:10:19 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
>So I guess if you are going to be operating in a fairly >empty band, the 7800 is the way to go :-) How many times did they have to do a master reset? So I guess if you are going to be operating in a fairly busy contest, the 7800 is the way to go? B-) B-) B-) 73 Billy AA4NU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published, John L Merrill |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published, Duane A Calvin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published, Grant Youngman |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published, John L Merrill |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |