Clark:
I guess it all depends on how you view the comments. Is the glass
half full or is it half empty? I really don't find the comments posted on
this board to be very heavy criticisms. No, not at all. I rather find them
a mix of technical comparisons which I find very helpful and
questions/praise/ disbelief that the Icom costs so much more than the Orion
and is not substantially better.
I remember similar comparisons/ comments about the Collins KWM-2 and
S-Line versus the Drake TR-4 and C-Line way back in the 60s-70s. Yes, that
was the same sort of thing because the Collins was so much more expensive
than the Drake. I couldn't afford a Collins, but I did buy a Drake C-Line.
That was some good gear back then.
I think that the discussion is healthy and I enjoy it. Matter of
fact, if the 7800 was materially better than my Orion I would be saving a
few $$$$ to buy one. But, it isn't!
Have a GREAT Holiday Weekend. Now that my pine trees are gone, I'm
going to see if I can get my new SteppIR up in the air.
73s,
Bernard, WA4OEJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Clark Savage Turner" <csturner@kcbx.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] iCom's approach to the 7800 issues
> I believe that the way to discuss the technical achievements of
> state-of-the-art Ten Tec gear is to discuss Ten Tec gear, with an
> occasional comparison. I find the very heavy criticisms of ICOM
> disheartening (I don't argue with their "truth") since I don't think it
> makes Ten Tec's look better to highlight other manufacturers apparent
> failures.
>
> Just one man's opinion.
>
> Clark
> WA3JPG
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|