TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] RE: [Orion] Orion subreceiver

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RE: [Orion] Orion subreceiver
From: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:46:25 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
This may be another opportunity for INRAD. I think their roofing filter 
for the MP is 75mhz. I ordered one for my Omni VI and it should arrive 
any day. They are expensive but according to initial test, this will 
place the VI at the top of the IMD chart. 
N4LQ

-----Original Message-----
From: n1eu@netscape.net (Barry N1EU)
To: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:53:42 -0500
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RE: [Orion] Orion subreceiver

> "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com> wrote:
> 
> >Is the reason for the sub par sub receiver due to not having a roofing
> >filter?
> >If not, what is the difference between it and main rx?
> >N4LQ
> >
> 
> The subreceiver has a 1st i.f. of 45Mhz and a 2nd i.f. of 450Khz and
> lacks the provision for a narrow roofing filter.  It was never intended
> to be a competition grade receiver.  I wish there was an extra cost
> option to upgrade it to main rx performance, but I'm not sure if many
> others feel the same way.
> 
> 73,
> Barry N1EU
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________
> Switch to Netscape Internet Service.
> As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at
> http://isp.netscape.com/register
> 
> Netscape. Just the Net You Need.
> 
> New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
> Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
> Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>