| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] dual receive |
| From: | John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:02:34 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Carl, et al: Re the RX-320 as a second receiver, my impression is that it's a pretty primitive receiver and would not hold up in pileups, etc. Am I wrong? 73, John, W3ULS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Additional Info on "What Am I Missing?", Kim Elmore |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 14,220 noise, Ron Castro |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] dual receive - RX 320 and Pegasus, Robert W Hosken |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] dual receive, Carl Moreschi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |