TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc.

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc.
From: John Molenda <cdistflatfoot@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:36:04 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
  Well said Art !     John kb2huk

On 9/27/2010 1:57 PM, Art Trampler wrote:
> One needs to remember that the surge in American prosprity, post WW2, was 
> largly because with the possible exception of Argentina, the US had the only 
> sizable industrial/manufacturing infratstructure left in the world. Bombs 
> took care of the rest.Peron took care of Argentina.
>   
> So for 25 years the only place one could turn for halfway decent to good 
> consumder goods was the US; and for another 15 years, the only place to go 
> for decent capital goods was the US.
>   
> Under that system wages and benefits grew considerably as there was little 
> (price) elasticity of demand for US made products, as substitutes were 
> largely unavailable.
>   
> This is no longer the case and said change, coupled with comparative 
> advantages in labor and tax rates (and in many countries regulatory costs), 
> makes the US goods relatively mroe expensive worldwide, even without an 
> artificially devalued yuan. Of course productivity benefits used to offset 
> the wage differential, but that gap is closing too.
>
> I think we need to recall the state of the world's industrial base post WW2 
> to understand the arc that we are on.
>   
> Art, KØRO
>   
> PS: I'd happily own an Orion II and maybe an Eagle (let's hope it does not 
> turn out to be a screaming chicken). There aren't many rigs for which I'd 
> give up my Omni VI.
>   
> PPS: Good thing this is not another reflector concerned more with vertically 
> oriented implements of steel and aluminium; we'd have been warned to find a 
> more suitable venue by now!
>
> --- On Mon, 9/27/10, Kris Merschrod<Kris@merschrod.net>  wrote:
>
>
> From: Kris Merschrod<Kris@merschrod.net>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc.
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"<tentec@contesting.com>
> Date: Monday, September 27, 2010, 12:48 PM
>
>
> I, too have been drawn into the QSO here.  If you use the US currancy
> inflater at :
>
> http://www.usinflationcalculator.com/
>
> Then at $700 in 1978  the Titon would be $2,343 today.  So T-T is running at
> the inflation rate.  Unfortunately, the competition started off way below
> our wage rates and is still way below - hence the low cost of imported
> radios.
>
> Our blind faith in free-market ideology has kept us from looking around to
> see what is happening (or what was happening to other countries when we had
> the comparative advantage).  Balanced trade would have been a better
> strategy, but, heck, when you are sitting at the card table and the chips
> are flowing your way, who would want to change the game?
>
> I wonder why the house keeps giving us more chips to play with when it is
> obvious that our luck has run out?  Actually, the answer to that question is
> in a great book called "1421"  It is about the Chinese navagation advances,
> but also about their trading policies way back then.
>
> We are playing checkers and they are playing Go.
>
> Moral of the story?  Buy Tentec!
>
> Kris KM2KM
>
>
> Merschrod
> 123 Warren Road
> Ithaca, NY 14850
> www.merschrod.net
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pumbaa"<pinkertontommrs@bellsouth.net>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"<tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 12:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Eagle
>
>
>> A lot of people did not have their income increase some 285% from 1978 to
>> today.  That is the problem as companies can't sell as many ham radio sets
>> as they do large LCD TV sets. HTs now seem very cheap especially a certain
>> brand made in China. If your income has equaled the inflation rate then
>> today's radios are probably cheaper than those of 1978,
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "mike bryce"<prosolar@sssnet.com>
>> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"<tentec@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 10:52 AM
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] The Eagle
>>
>>
>> This has been an interesting thread. It got me out of the shadows.
>>
>> I haven't looked it up but in 1978 the triton was someplace around $700
>> stripped with no noise blanker or cw filters, analog version.
>>
>> today that's about over two grand.
>> <Clip>
>>
>> Mike, WB8VGE
>> SunLight Energy Systems
>> The Heathkit Shop
>> http://www.theheathkitshop.com/
>> J e e p
>> o|||||||o
>> Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large
>> number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>