TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] .....Very good, but it doesn't do MARS

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] .....Very good, but it doesn't do MARS
From: "al sirois" <alsirois@roadrunner.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 04:24:03 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I spoke to the factory yesterday to see if the MARS chip in the Jupiter 
Is interchangeable with the Eagle.
I was going to trade in one of my Jupiters and upgrade to the Eagle; but I
was disappointed. TenTec will not be going in this direction.

Al Sirois NNN0WNA
East Boothbay, ME 04544-0002
N1MHC@arrl.net
============================

-----Original Message-----
From: w8au@sssnet.com [mailto:w8au@sssnet.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 12:19 AM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] F/S Tne Tec Orion II Model 566......Very good, but it
doesn't do MARS

At 06:19 PM 10/13/2010, Bwana Bob wrote:
>   I thought that all MARS gear now has to meet a 20 ppm, I think,  NTIA
>frequency stability spec, which requires the purchase of
>commercial/military gear such as Harris or Motorola.

There was talk of that two years ago.  CAP now requires it, since a
lot of their folks know nothing about radio adjustment. And maybe
Army MARS was thinking of it, but the talk has died down...Nothing
mentioned in the past year.  Navy/Marine Corps MARS was not promoting it.

Perry NNN0VNO


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>