TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] O3 wish list

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] O3 wish list
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 09:17:52 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yes, but aren't many folks going to need a computer upgrade to
efficiently run PowerSDR if they have older single core cpu's?

That's why I like the SDR-IQ approach for a panadapter as it handles the bulk of processing. CPU utilization with SpectraVue is very small in relation to PowerSDR/IF. So low, that I can use the SpectraVue with an ATOM-based CPU in a netbook PC. I could not run PowerSDR/IF on my Samsung netbook. A small netbook with the tiny SDR-IQ makes for a nice portable package that does not eat up significant battery time on my netbook.

Floyd is right again about SDR-IQ being somewhat deaf on the high bands and may not be the best option for folks who want to split the receive RF from receivers that provide no IF port (e.g., Omni VII). But when sampling an IF port, SDR-IQ is only working at 8-9 MHz where it's still very sensitive and the noise figure of the IF port is held low as sampling occurs after the first mixer.

Paul, W9AC

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>