Carl,
I'd agree with that, with the possible exception of 6 meters if including
it would affect performance on the other bands. John H? What do you think
about that?
73 Ray
In a message dated 5/18/2011 6:05:10 P.M. GMT Standard Time,
n4py2@earthlink.net writes:
My Orion III would be an Orion II with the addition of a sub-receiver
that is equal to the main receiver, a 9 mhz IF out jack, and receive
antenna out/back in loop connections so you could add devices such as a
noise cancelor in series with the receiver. It would also have 6 meters.
Carl Moreschi N4PY
121 Little Bell Dr.
Hays, NC 28635
www.n4py.com
On 5/18/2011 1:50 PM, Frank Kirschner wrote:
> Listen to the NR on the FTdx-5000. It can pull a signal out of the noise
and make an unreadable signal readable, and a noisy signal armchair copy.
This works on SSB as well as CW. I don't know what algorithm they're using,
but it really works.
>
> 73,
> Frank
> KF6E
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Carl Moreschi
> Sent: 05/14/11 11:37 AM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion III
>
> The NR you are talking about does not exist on any radio. Still to
this day I have never seen an NR that truely helps with copy. They might make
things quieter but copy is always best under difficult conditions with NR
off. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Dr. Hays, NC 28635 www.n4py.com On
5/14/2011 11:12 AM, Tony Lelieveld wrote:> Hi all,> > I agree. I'd go
with an external panadapter. Why are people rumbling about> an Orion III?
Let's get the O-II finalized first. I am still waiting for> an upgrade that
will improve the NR part of the rig. One that, when you> activate it, will
truly reduce the noise WITHOUT altering the audio quality> of the voice
you're receiving.> > On some signals it seems to work okay but mostly it
distorts the audio and> acts erratically and I am running ver. 2.044A.
Different settings of the> AGC threshold and manual AGC level do not seem to
make much difference.> > 73, Tony VE3DWI> > > ----- Original Message
-----> From: "Bar
ry N1EU"<
> barry.n1eu@gmail.com> > To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec
Equipment"<tentec@contesting.com> > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 12:29 PM>
Subject: Re:
[TenTec] O3 wish list> > >> Well said and totally agree Paul. Limited
engineering resources can>> be put to much better use. If the rig mfr
provides I.F. output,>> they've done their job.>
_______________________________________________> TenTec mailing list>
TenTec@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|