TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion III

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion III
From: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:04:57 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
My Orion III would be an Orion II with the addition of a sub-receiver that is equal to the main receiver, a 9 mhz IF out jack, and receive antenna out/back in loop connections so you could add devices such as a noise cancelor in series with the receiver. It would also have 6 meters.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
121 Little Bell Dr.
Hays, NC 28635
www.n4py.com

On 5/18/2011 1:50 PM, Frank Kirschner wrote:
Listen to the NR on the FTdx-5000. It can pull a signal out of the noise and 
make an unreadable signal readable, and a noisy signal armchair copy. This 
works on SSB as well as CW. I don't know what algorithm they're using, but it 
really works.

  73,
  Frank
  KF6E
----- Original Message -----
From: Carl Moreschi
Sent: 05/14/11 11:37 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion III

  The NR you are talking about does not exist on any radio. Still to this day I have never seen an NR that truely helps with copy. They 
might make things quieter but copy is always best under difficult conditions with NR off. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Dr. Hays, 
NC 28635 www.n4py.com On 5/14/2011 11:12 AM, Tony Lelieveld wrote:>  Hi all,>  >  I agree. I'd go with an external panadapter. 
Why are people rumbling about>  an Orion III? Let's get the O-II finalized first. I am still waiting for>  an upgrade that will 
improve the NR part of the rig. One that, when you>  activate it, will truly reduce the noise WITHOUT altering the audio quality> 
 of the voice you're receiving.>  >  On some signals it seems to work okay but mostly it distorts the audio and>  acts 
erratically and I am running ver. 2.044A. Different settings of the>  AGC threshold and manual AGC level do not seem to make much 
difference.>  >  73, Tony VE3DWI>  >  >  ----- Original Message ----->  From: "Bar
ry N1EU"<
  barry.n1eu@gmail.com>  >  To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"<tentec@contesting.com>  >  Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 
12:29 PM>  Subject: Re: [TenTec] O3 wish list>  >  >>  Well said and totally agree Paul. Limited engineering resources can>>  
be put to much better use. If the rig mfr provides I.F. output,>>  they've done their job.>  
_______________________________________________>  TenTec mailing list>  TenTec@contesting.com>  
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>  _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>