TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?

from [Richards] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:41:31 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 
OK, Steve.  You got me.   I plead guilty on taking things
too seriously now.


Re-reading your post and NOW seeing the little smiley face thingy...
I can see I got suckered into making one last reply !

        Oops.    I hate it what that happens...     ;-)


============  Happy days Steve / JHR  ==================



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?, Richards
Next by Date:  Re: [TenTec] Antenna-Analyzer, Paul Christensen
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?, Richards
Next by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?, Jim Brown
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]