TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:00:54 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Geeze...  re-reading this it sounds too argumentative... not my 
intention.   Sorry if this came off a bit heavy-handed.

----------------------------  JHR  --------------------------


On 11/16/2011 2:56 PM, Richards wrote:
> Nuts.   Does not mean anything.   You are reading into it more than
> appears warranted by the text, reaching your own conclusions for reasons
> not stated in the text.
>
> They did not mention everyone.  So he said Elecraft and Flex are
> "newcomers" -- the fact he did not mention all the "oldcomers" means
> nothing.
>
> I say the only way to know is to ask him, so I did.  I will let you know
> what I hear... of anything...
>
> =======================================James -K8JHR  ============
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>