TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution
From: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:03:11 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I'm afraid that one is shorter: "It's not worth pissing off the XYL"


On Jul 11, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:

> Is there a coralary for pissing off the XYL?
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of k6jek
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 9:58 PM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution
> 
> And there is the N6DVD rule which states: "It's not worth pissing off the
> neighbors for less than 3 dB."
> 
>> Stuart said:
>> In the end, the success of any antenna is can you match it 
>> conveniently, and does it produce contacts?
>> 
>> -Stuart Rohre
>> K5KVH
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>