TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna
From: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Reply-to: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 08:18:12 +0000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Interesting commentary, Ken.

I DO have a 40m ground plan with 65 radials. And it has that textbook 38 ohm low SWR you mention. It seems to work swell... but your comment suggests it could be better.

A friend suggested I make it slightly taller and add some capacitance until it presents a an inherent 50 ohm load. (I think that is what he said... let's assume HE said it right, if this is not a good idea... and presume I remember it wrong...)


    So - What would YOU do with my antenna to make it  work better?


(This is NOT an argument - it is a very serious question to me.)

--------------------  K8JHR -----------------------

------ Original Message ------
From: "Ken Brown" <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>

A quarter wavelength vertical over an excellent ground counterpoise system has an impedance of about 37 ohms. If you don't need a matching device to get a 1:1 SWR at the resonant point, then it is likely you have about 13 ohms of loss resistance (the kind that produces heat, versus radiation resistance, the kind that produces a radiated signal) that added to the 37 ohms of radiation resistance makes a perfect match to your 50 ohm coax. Very convenient. Not very effective. What would you rather have? A low SWR or a stronger signal? Many hams have chosen (perhaps unwittingly) a low SWR.

_________________________________________

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>