TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna

from [Stuart Rohre] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna
From: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:17:15 -0600
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
No one listening to the 38 ohm antenna will be able to tell the difference in signal level from a 50 ohm antenna. There is way more variability in the inonosphere than that small mis-match. Save your time for operating!! 
Gud DX, try 10!
Stuart Rohre
K5KVH
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [TenTec] Omni VI + KC digit, John King
Next by Date:  Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna, R. Eric Sluder
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna, Carl Moreschi
Next by Thread:  Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]