TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters
From: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>
Reply-to: rmcgraw@blomand.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 14:48:18 -0600 (CST)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
That's good news.

The length of coax is some portion of an electrical wavelength.  It
simply adds some value of reactance which then the tuner is able to
match.

Just for curiosity, have you tried to measure either the Z or the SWR
between the tuner and the LMR400.  I bet the SWR is real high.  But not
to worry, the LMR400 has low loss even with high SWR.

73
Bob, K4TAX


> Bob, and the gang,
>
> I added a random length of LMR400 coax between the output of the coupler
> and the 1:1 balun.
>
> I?am guessing I?m tuning the coax and not so much coupling energy into
> the doublet. But now, the palstar and the Ten Tec 238 can find a tuning
> solution at 1.8000 mhz. Without the extra length coax length, neither one
> would. I have not tried other frequencies yet on either coupler.
>
> Remember, I changed the length of the coax from the back of the tuner to
> the 1: 1 balun. NOT the length of the 600 ohm feed line
>
> mike, WB8VGE
>
>
> Mike Bryce
> prosolar@sssnet.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


-- 
Disclosure:
I am a Tentec Ambassador and compensated according to the Tentec
Ambassador plan. I serve as a volunteer beta test person for the Omni
VII, Eagle and Argonaut VI products.   Otherwise, I hold no business or
employment interest with Tentec.

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>