TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] More on WRTC Results

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] More on WRTC Results
From: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:38:25 +0200
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Jim, in the beginning we thought it was cool to have a YL team here in our
Bavarian Contest Club.
However once they began kicking our behinds... it wasn't quite as cool as we
thought (hi).
Our girls are GOOD!

We are campaigning to get WRTC here in Germany in 2018.
If successful, I will be very busy because my company will (probably) be
sponsoring the antennas.
I first thought it was a great idea, until I learned it would be 60 teams.
It doesn't come out of my pocket, but I'm on the service delivery side.
Can you spell  W O R K !  (hi)

73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt am Main)


-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 10:16 PM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] More on WRTC Results

On 7/22/2014 12:39 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
> Well the No.1 team was from the states and had the home advantage.
> No.2 was from the Slovak Republic and No.3 was from our Bavarian 
> Contest Club - both teams being European.

Of course. The same thing happened in Russia four years ago -- EU ops tended
to do better.

I chatted with W6OAT on Sunday at the NCDXC picnic. He was referee for the
team that was two German YLs. He described them as superb operators. 
The placed a very respectable #21, 0.3% behind N4YDU, and with an excellent
1.3% error rate.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>