TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC
From: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:37:49 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Which part of his message are you referring to Rick?

Best regards - Bry Carling



> On Jul 25, 2014, at 6:05 PM, "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de> wrote:
> 
> If you were in Europe, you would quickly revise your priorities.
> 
> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> (Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike
> Stricker via TenTec
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 11:12 PM
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC
> 
> By no stretch of the imagination am I a contester, let alone a serious
> contester.  I dabble in all the SSB contests, however, and my experience has
> been that once a radio has a minimum level of performance, ease of use winds
> up being more important.  Perhaps the laboratory measurements don't really
> tell the whole story:-)  The ICOMs are certainly a lot more user friendly
> than the American made radios.
> 
> I would much rather use my modified IC-7200 over my Eagle under contest
> conditions and would much rather use my Eagle when I work my regular
> schedules.
> 
> OK, now flame me.
> 
> Mike, WA1SEO
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>