TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] MIKE & Eagle

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] MIKE & Eagle
From: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:01:28 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I agree that as part of ham radio, we are not professionals. However, there is nothing standing in our way to learn and improve.

I am finding more and more that proper mike technique is missing and thus this contributes largely to poor audio quality. Now poor audio does not mean that the audio is distorted, nor does it mean that one has humm or buzz on their signal. These are obvious audio faults and should be corrected.

Look at the big picture, does the voice sound full bodied and natural? It should.

Is the noise heard from the background of activities in the room or amp fans blowing? These should not be heard and can be corrected by working close to the mike and reducing mike gain and or reducing speech processor activity..

Is there noise caused by the inhale and exhale of breath? This should not be heard and can be corrected by proper mike position.

Is the excessive noise caused by improper mike gain or excessive speech processing levels. This should not be heard and can be corrected by the operator.

Someone said that we should talk across the face of the mike. Speaking of professionals, do you ever see one of them doing this? Nope! They work tight and straight on axis with a proper wind screen or blast filter.

Someone said that we should hold the mike at arms length from the face. Oh boy, talk about needed mike gain and picking up surrounding noise. This is a good way to achieve that and this is not going to result in good sounding audio. If you wish to work 12" to 18" from the mike then one best have a very quiet room and one that is acoustically quite good in that regard. Most of us don't have that privilege nor facility.

As a rule, for communication purposes, the mike should be used on axis and at a distance of 1" to no more than the length of one fist for a mouth-to-mike distance. If then there are issues, address the issues with pop or breath filters, proper mike gain and speech processor gain and if one uses any type of EQ then that should be addressed as well.

As was stated earlier, if you use a headset type mike, position the mike at the corner of the mouth, between the mouth and the chin. When one opens the mouth the chin drops and thus the mike is aligned with the open mouth. If the mike is positioned too high the only thing emitting sound is largely nasal coming from the nose. This too high position also contributes to a large amount of noise from the inhale and exhale process. Headset or boom mikes are great of one is prone to looking around the room while talking. In this case it maintains proper and constant mouth-to-mike position.

Yes, we do need to learn and improve. And the best part, it doesn't cost any money.

73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- From: "Froiseth Richard" <Rfwd6dok@centurylink.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2014 11:32 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] MIKE & Eagle


Richard,
I agree with what you have said. I will make a point to use your suggestion when on the air. I also appsheate you taking the time to pass on your expertise in this area to educate the Ham Radio community. But just remember it's Ham radio, we are not professionals.


73’s
Rich, WD6DOK







On Aug 24, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com> wrote:

Agreed... all points. YES, a wind screen is a good plan, for both audio quality and sanitation... and a little care in mic placement can also be a huge help.

One of the most common ham radio mistakes (I think) is poor headset microphone placement. It should be placed to the side, just off the corner of the mouth, where one is far less likely to breath, puff and pop into it... but not too far out, just enough to the side to be clear of your breathing.

BUT THE WORST ASPECT IS that PRODUCT PHOTOS AND SALES LITERATURE OFTEN DEPICT THE MICROPHONE RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE SPEAKER'S MOUTH AND RIGHT UNDER HIS NOSE - and that makes it difficult to convince operators to move it over and out of the way. This is another example of Marketing having NO CLUE what Engineering is doing. Even companies producing speech recognition software, and companies making commercial phone center headsets, have marketing photos depicting the microphone RIGHT UNDER THEIR NOSES... (pun intended) where it is most likely to pick up huffs, puffs and especially pops from plosives like P and T and B, etc.

One of my biggest pet peeves in ham radio is the old timer who huffs, puffs and pops his way through a conversation about how to be a good operator. Ohhhh ... that really burns me up! (Say this last line aloud in your best Yosemite Sam voice...) ;-)

=================== K8JHR  ========================



On 8/24/2014 5:16 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
For ham applications, I generally agree, although the windscreen can make a big difference in breath pops and spittiness. To me, the most difficult things to get right are comfort, build quality, isolation from room sounds, and headphone quality. I'd be surprised if the cost of electret element in the most expensive ham mic exceeds $0.50.






=============================================================





.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>