TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] New Radios in the Future

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] New Radios in the Future
From: Steve Berg <wa9jml@frontier.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 19:03:47 -0600
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I have been following this thread with both interest and trepidation. It appears that in order to be competitive, a station needs a high end computer, that can run software for logging, scanning the DX cluster websites, turn the antenna or steer the phased array to the most optimal direction for any given station, show a display for CW skimmer, and all the operator needs to do is click on the station shown on the display, and the computer and radio do the rest, including sending the code for the signal report or other exchange criteria. At most the mere human needs to slightly twiddle a few knobs, the fewer the better, or perhaps hit a button a few times now and then.

If this is the case, you are stopping just short of a revolutionary advance in contesting. Why not build up a really high end computer, like those that one of my friends constructs for his musical work, and eliminate the weakest link in the contesting station? I am sure that the computer could completely take over the station, and run it to much higher scores. Perhaps someone, probably Gordon West, could write a program so that the computers actually get licensed themselves. Much of the studying for the exams now is done by rote memory, and computers can certainly excel at that. They might even take the test on-line. Why not just automate the entire process, and eliminate the error prone human being that needs at least some sleep and rest breaks?

Climbing into my flame proof suit...

73,

Steve WA9JML
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>