Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: GAP Vertical Question

To: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: GAP Vertical Question
From: Ashton Lee <Ashton.R.Lee@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:19:41 -0700
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
What I can add from personal experience is that a vertical dipole (center fed 
half wave) without radials, on a rocky cliff top is an absolute killer antenna 
on the upper HF bands. My vertical dipole works so well that in contests I 
often just quit using my yagis because of the hassle of rotating or even 
switching them. The omnidirectional vertical is only maybe 3 dB down on very 
good directional antennas.

Center fed half waves on 160 are a lot harder to set up, so I have no 
experience there. But if I had a used broadcast tower it sure would be fun to 
try one.




On Dec 17, 2012, at 7:33 AM, "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:

> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
> To: <topband@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 9:07 AM
> Subject: Re: Topband: GAP Vertical Question
> 
> 
>>> Right, typically a couple hundred ohms.  Modeling the base Z of a thick 
>>> broadcast tower is very difficult with MoM software.  Changes in thickness 
>>> can result in large base Z changes.
>> 
>> Just to be clear, since the discussion drifted to half-wave radiators, my 
>> comment above was specific to the modeling of thick v. thin half-wave 
>> radiators, including the 180-195 degree radiators of some well-known 50KW AM 
>> stations.  The results when modeling the base Z of approx. 1/4-wave 
>> radiators is less affected by thickness, probably due to a lower base Z to 
>> start with.
>> 
>> Paul, W9AC
> 
> In the 1920's several BC towers were half waves without radials on hilltops. 
> Performance was poor due to the height plus the lack of a decent ground on 
> solid rock limiting the ground wave signal to a low value.
> As a side note tapered towers were also in vogue but that presented other 
> problems.
> 
> It wasnt until the educated scientific studies of the 30's and published 
> papers/books that resulted that broadcasters began to standardize.....along 
> with some push from the FCC.
> 
> Here we are over 70 years later still arguing the subject and embroiled in 
> myths and some folks are very protective of their alternate beliefs.
> 
> Did the 100mpg carburetor ever exist? Is this planet only 9000 years old (-; ?
> 
> Carl
> KM1H 
> _______________________________________________
> Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
> 

_______________________________________________
It is undesirable to believe a proposition when there is no ground whatsoever 
for supposing it is true. &#8212; Bertrand Russell

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>