Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [allowed] Re: [TowerTalk] Ground radials

To: "Towertalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [allowed] Re: [TowerTalk] Ground radials
From: Didier Juges <didier@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 13:55:18 -0600
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I am not sure I would agree with that statement. The purpose of the ground wire network is to reduce resistive losses in the ground. The wire has an effect of reducing the resistivity of the ground under the antenna, on a macro basis. If you use insulated wire, you loose the benefit of conductivity between the wires and the soil, which overall will increase resistivity compared to non-insulated wire.

For instance, below is a wire (to the left) and 2 points in the ground (the X's, marked A and B)). With insulated wire, the resistance between A and B is purely driven by soil resistivity. With non-insulated wire, the current will jump from A to the wire, then travel through the wire up to the point closest to B, then jump to B through the soil. The overall resistance between A and B will be lower with non-insulated wire, so the losses should be less.

|
|
|
|   X (A)
|
|
|
|
|
|   X (B)
|
|
|

73,
Didier KO4BB

At 07:37 PM 12/22/2003, Gene Smar wrote:
Tom:

     Electrically it doesn't make a difference whether the wire's insulated
or not.  Mechanically, the insulation gives you a significant degree of
protection against corrosion and eventual disappearance of the radial wire.


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>