Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] New Cushcraft XM240 Trouble

To: <K7LXC@aol.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com>,<RadioIR@charter.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] New Cushcraft XM240 Trouble
From: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Reply-to: garyschafer@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:03:29 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Sure add more feed line to any poor antenna and it will "look better at the
other end". But that doesn't mean the antenna is working properly.

The proper place to measure is at the antenna.

73
Gary  K4FMX

> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of K7LXC@aol.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:38 AM
> To: towertalk@contesting.com; RadioIR@charter.net
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] New Cushcraft XM240 Trouble
> 
> 
> In a message dated 4/12/2006 8:44:01 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> towertalk-request@contesting.com writes:
> 
> >  Your analyzer could also be lying to you.
> 
>     After working on over 200 ham tower/antenna  installations, the only
> thing that matters to me is how the antenna looks in  the shack at the end
> of the
> feedline. That's my bottom line. Sometimes an  antenna looks a little
> funny
> when measured up on the tower but looks FB in the  shack ( e.g. C31XR).
> 
> Cheers,
> Steve     K7LXC
> TOWER TECH
> Cell: 206-890-4188
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>