Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters

To: jeremy-ca <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:50:13 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I don't get it.  That's going to generate several thousand documents to 
wade through, most of which won't address your claim.  Why come back 
with such an obtuse and evasive answer if you actually have the 
references?  I think you just make this junk up and then try to bully 
your way through the responses.

Dave   AB7E



jeremy-ca wrote:
>>> BC band engineers have proven that an elevated
>>> system delivers the same field strength OR BETTER than a classic 128
>>> buried radials at the same site.
>>>       
>> Perhaps you might cite the specific references in the literature that
>> say that. The ones I've read don't say that.
>>     
>
>
> I guess you can find them the same way I did; try Google. I'll even give you 
> a couple of key words to assist. Elevated Radials; Unipole; Folded Unipole; 
> Broadcast Antennas to name a few.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
>
>   
>> 73,
>>
>> Jim Brown K9YC
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>   
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>