Dave,
Maybe if possible just forget him. You've seen him do that before and he
will again. He is just one of those 'self proclaimed' experts who will
always have either more or better data then anybody else. You will never
hear him admit that he is wrong and it will be an endless battle and not
worth your effort.
Jim- WA9FPT
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Gilbert" <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
To: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Cc: "TowerTalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>; "Jim Brown"
<jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 meters
>
> I don't get it. That's going to generate several thousand documents to
> wade through, most of which won't address your claim. Why come back
> with such an obtuse and evasive answer if you actually have the
> references? I think you just make this junk up and then try to bully
> your way through the responses.
>
> Dave AB7E
>
>
>
> jeremy-ca wrote:
>>>> BC band engineers have proven that an elevated
>>>> system delivers the same field strength OR BETTER than a classic 128
>>>> buried radials at the same site.
>>>>
>>> Perhaps you might cite the specific references in the literature that
>>> say that. The ones I've read don't say that.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I guess you can find them the same way I did; try Google. I'll even give
>> you
>> a couple of key words to assist. Elevated Radials; Unipole; Folded
>> Unipole;
>> Broadcast Antennas to name a few.
>>
>> Carl
>> KM1H
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> 73,
>>>
>>> Jim Brown K9YC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|