Kevin Normoyle wrote:
> Stan Stockton wrote:
>> As mentioned the lower section would be large (33 inch face) tower
>> with 3 inch diameter legs. The top would either be 55G or 65G.
>>
> It doesn't matter whether you analyze the top section as if it started
> on the ground or on top of something else.
> It's the same analysis. right?. (except higher wind higher)
>
> the first post said
>
> "about 75 feet of 55G or 65G that would telescope into about the same
> length of larger tower (33 inch face, 3 inch legs),"
>
> Even chopping 15' off that for a joint, you're saying 60' of unsupported
> 55g.
> I guess you could say you're designing for 0mph wind. The problem is you
> want to design for close tolerances, so the top doesn't bang around a
> lot in a slight wind. But if it bends, then the tight tolerances mean it
> won't come down. So knowing whether the top section is going to bend
> seems important.
>
I think one could design the supports so that it can take quite a bit of
flex, without binding. Rollers are one approach.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|