Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 75 or 70 Ohm twinlead or ladderline cable - does it exis

To: Dan Hearn <n5ardxcc@gmail.com>, donhall161 <donhall161@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 75 or 70 Ohm twinlead or ladderline cable - does it exist?
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:21:25 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 3/24/2014 5:41 PM, Dan Hearn wrote:
I remember 75 ohm twinlead built specifically for RF use. It used rather large stranded wire quite close spaced. It was rather stiff and the plastic coating was not the stuff used in Zip cord. I believe it was capable of running quite high power

I remember low loss 300 ohm line made by Belden (which implies beefy conductors, and thus low loss, and my copy of the 1971 lists several versions of it, including one rated for 1kW.

Remember that Zo is determined by conductor diameter, spacing, and the dielectric, and that both power handling and loss are determined by conductor diameter and Zo. Thus, the kW rated 300 ohm cables used smaller conductors than the 75 ohm lines, and were wider spaced.

Note that my previous post describing Belden 8210 is neither conjecture nor distant memory -- I was looking at both the specs in the 1971 Belden catalog and the physical cable itself, which is still in my stash of goodies!

BTW -- 72 ohms was chosen because it was the Z at resonance of a dipole in free space. We paid attention to that in those days, overlooking the fact that a low dipole over good ground had a lower Z at resonance. :)

73, Jim K9YC


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>