Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Tower Grounds

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Tower Grounds
From: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:47:06 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
So, would I be correct in assuming in this case, that it would be "better" to have the strap bond as close to the bottom/foundation as reasonable to reduce the "parallel conductor" distance?
In my case, there are threaded steel rods in the foundation, not a tower 
section...  So the bond would be made to the tower leg that is 
sitting/bolted in/to a steel clevis bolted to the threaded rod.  I will 
give additional attention to this inward force to which you refer in the 
mechanical design.... perhaps a thicker strap and more craftsmanship in 
the shaping thereof is in order. <wink>.
PS - Pretty stinkin' neat to learn something new.... Here's a link that 
explains the math/theory at a reasonably understandable level.  <smile>
http://www.kshitij-iitjee.com/Magnetic-force-between-two-parallel-conductors

Thanks Jim!

______________________
Clay Autery, KY5G
MONTAC Enterprises
(318) 518-1389

On 10/16/2017 11:11 PM, jimlux wrote:
Remember that parallel currents cause conductors to be forced 
together. So your conductor that is bowed out and away, and basically 
in parallel with the current carried through the base and concrete, is 
going to be pulled in towards the tower to try and minimize the gap.
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>