WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[WriteLog] Telnet vs Packet Cluster

To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: [WriteLog] Telnet vs Packet Cluster
From: rojomn@charter.net (rojomn)
Date: Thu Mar 6 12:32:57 2003
Telnet is much likely to be better. It can handle more data and usually gets
input from much wider sources. The local cluster is the local cluster and
you have no control of the source of the spots.
I don't think it is even a close call, use the telnet.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: writelog-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:writelog-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Dennis
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:07 AM
> To: WriteLog@contesting.com
> Subject: [WriteLog] Telnet vs Packet Cluster
>
>
> I have seen TelNet options on many logging programs and have
> never tried this option.  I use a TNC and monitor the local DX
> cluster for alerts but now wondering if the TelNet is better.
> Any comments or suggestions on using the TelNet vs Local packet cluster?
>
> Thanks, that new guy,
>
> Dennis AB8NI
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>