Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Steve: 2016 ]

Total 2016 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] Barking up the wrong ARRL DX tree (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:18:46 -0400
Yeah, right ! When was the last time you (or anyone else who normally lives near the east coast) operated from west of 90 degrees W longitude and came even close to winning the SOAB high power catego
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00082.html (9,192 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC web site (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:57:14 -0400
It would also be really nice if the WRTC 2006 web site would show some consideration for those of us who are stuck with slow, dial-up connections by not including frivolous pictures, movies, sounds,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00109.html (9,563 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] Barking Up the Wrong ARRL DX Tree (score: 1)
Author: <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:56:36 -0400
You're kidding, right? Both the ARRL 10 and ARRL 160 involve working a lot of Europeans, at least by the top stations. Explain how anybody "midwest/west" has a better shot at Europe on 160 meters th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00115.html (9,255 bytes)

64. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW DXCC (score: 1)
Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:11:22 +0000
Hello K4IK, You, as a US ham, can simply ask for a certificate and receive a postcard. I am already on ARRL file since I had my cards checked for the DXCC award in the past years, so I'd like to be a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00336.html (9,871 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW DXCC (score: 1)
Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:42:52 +0000
Hello K4IK, I don't think so. I've tried to do some math after reading the bottom of the https://p1k.arrl.org/lotw/dxccapply page and I've found out that LOTW will always be more expensive to me than
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00340.html (10,159 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coming soon!! - May CW SPRINT! - 0000-0400Z May 1,2005 (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:47:52 -0400
This is a great idea ! Are there teams for this Sprint ? The NCJ web site allows team sign-up, but that is probably just a relic from February. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00374.html (9,135 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dayton Forum Rooms for DX/Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:09:28 -0400
Guys and Gals, I just can't understand all this whining about the rescheduling/relocation of the Dayton forums. K1DG and K3LR are to be commended for turning Dayton into a first-rate contest conventi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00401.html (9,966 bytes)

68. [CQ-Contest] RE: [UK-CONTEST] FT1000 or FT1000MP? (LONG) - SUMMARY/DECISION (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Jones" <steve@rjtraining.fsnet.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 22:34:54 -0000
Happy New Year to all, and thanks to all your helpful replies to my original questions. Here is a shortish summary of what I got / have concluded: A number of people replying advised me to keep the f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00039.html (13,634 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HQ stations - final results question (score: 1)
Author: "Steve London" <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:14:37 -0000
This has been an ongoing problem with the IARU scoring for years ! Having been victimized by this sloppiness many times, I have privately made this problem well known to N1ND, N7NG, and his predecess
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00179.html (16,250 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU Scores Database (score: 1)
Author: "Steve London" <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:24:45 -0000
Ah yes....another year and the IARU scores published in QST are botched. This is getting really old. How about this in future years....delay publishing the QST writeup until AFTER the scores have bee
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00218.html (11,251 bytes)

71. RE: [CQ-Contest] Feb 04 QST op-ed article (score: 1)
Author: "Hanlon, Steve" <SHanlon@dnr.state.md.us>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:59:43 -0500
having not passed my CW requirement i can only listen to the HF bands. and listen i do. during this past contest, i heard the usually congestion in the mid-ranges of the bands, but higher up, things
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00344.html (9,734 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] DX Participation in NAQP Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Root" <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:58:08 -0000
While increased DX participation might be more enjoyable for those in a position to take advantage of that, the rest of us most certainly wouldn't like it. I happen to like competing in some contests
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00373.html (9,763 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest]re: NAQP and the (midwest)(south)east coast (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Root" <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:43:45 -0000
I'll second what Kelly has to say. DX propagation is slightly better in St. Paul than in Winnipeg, but it's still very difficult from here. For that reason, domestic contests attract more participati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00429.html (17,642 bytes)

74. [CQ-Contest] my first SO contest (score: 1)
Author: "Hanlon, Steve" <SHanlon@dnr.state.md.us>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:11:59 -0500
learned a great deal about propagation, efficent use of my radio, and contesting in general during this past weekend's ARRL VHF Sweepstakes. my first true foray into contesting, i set a personal goal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00460.html (9,430 bytes)

75. [CQ-Contest] contesting tips (score: 1)
Author: "Hanlon, Steve" <SHanlon@dnr.state.md.us>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:25:15 -0500
recently i was reading some tips about working different bands. one of the more notable concerned the correct way to search a band. conventional wisdom is to start at the bottom of the band and work
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00502.html (8,478 bytes)

76. RE: [CQ-Contest] contesting tips (score: 1)
Author: "Hanlon, Steve" <SHanlon@dnr.state.md.us>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:12:25 -0500
i made an error that i didn't catch until re-reading the post. USB should be tuned from the bottom and LSB from the top. i fix computers all day and USB is etched in my brain. sorry for the error. -
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00504.html (8,305 bytes)

77. [CQ-Contest] Secrets of contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Steve GW4BLE" <GW4BLE@btconnect.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 18:09:46 -0000
ID 100% after *every* contact No exceptions PERIOD. Steve GW4BLE -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://home1.p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00009.html (8,560 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Root" <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:27:51 -0000
This is further complicated when you factor in propagation. If you're on the low bands, that one time you send your call every five minutes is probably going to to be buried in noise or QRM. For a lo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00027.html (8,865 bytes)

79. RE: [CQ-Contest] Secrets of Contesting, Chapter 14 (score: 1)
Author: "Hanlon, Steve" <SHanlon@dnr.state.md.us>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 07:34:04 -0500
devil's advocate mode on: what if i believe i have the callsign correct, yet it turns out not to be? then what happens? my callsign, KB3KAQ, caused a little confusion during the recent VHF Sweepstak
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00029.html (8,905 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] More FCC - 10 meters (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:08:02 -0000
Are major JA mfgrs still selling ham gear at truck stops? This is a start. Now if the FCC would only go after the hundreds of illegal amps sold on e-Bay (the ones that cover 6-21 MHZ without a bandsw
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00073.html (14,544 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu