There were two differnet votes. One was about the section news (which was a roll call vote). For the contest line scores, I quote the earlier post: Therefore it would seem the current analysis of who
Well - to each their own - and anything that gets people excited about doing radio is good. However, for this op, having the radio signals in my head is where the fun is. Hearing those dahs come off
My TS850S repair web page has several new updates to it (thanks to people like you who are contributing). I know a lot of people use this radio in contests - and it is a very good value these days as
I have never used a TS570 - but my biggest complaint is that the early rigs had some really bad issues with sending CW and having the network going at the same time. It seemed that any network activi
Dear Contesters, As has already been reported - the ARRL DX CW Results have been pulled from the web site - just one day after being posted. This is due to a process problem that was discovered when
The ARRL SS CW contest is coming up this weekend. Hope everyone can make it on. I have had a few thoughts about some of the recent threads and how they apply to the SS. Here they are for anyone to fl
Or - how about prefixes only in DX contests (since there isn't any meaningful exchange information?). Tree At subbands (Saturday explain of You're right, Ron. Many U.S. guys called in below 21150. Ta
The NCJ CW Sprint is coming next weekend. You can see the results from February here http://www.ncjweb.com/cwsprint022005.pdf Rules and a link to the team registration can be found here http://www.nc
The NCJ Web page now has a hot link to the logs received. Go to www.ncjweb.com, click on Contests, and then scroll down to find the CW Sprint logs received link. Reminder, entries must be received no
The deadline for the CW Sprint has technically passed. However, I will be able to accept logs if they can be sent in today. The following logs with > 200 QSOs are still at large: Callsign Estimated Q
The results of the September CW Sprint can be found here: http://www.kkn.net/~tree/cwsprint-200509-results.txt Congrats to Dave, K5GN, on his second victory. Log check reports available from me via e
Google has these counts: Results 1 - 10 of about 315 for JJ3YBB. (0.45 seconds) Results 1 - 10 of about 1,120 for JA3YBB. (0.44 seconds) So - I think it s more likely that you really worked JA3YBB.
Can someone please suggest a better place to have the packet cluster practices thread than CQ-CONTEST? None of the comments made have any relevance to a contest situation. Congrats to N6MJ on breakin
Sending the call actually makes a lot of sense. As we jam pack togehter, and some people aren't precise in their ability to QNZ (a very old CW traffic handler saying indicating your ability to "zero
Even with a small signal - CQing is required to maximize your score. What does change is the frequency that you try to use. Don't expect to have much success on 14040 with 5 watts. Not even the might
All of this talk about CQing with 5 watts reminded me on one of my most incredible contest experiences. It was one of the SCCC Field Days using the call N6NB/6 up on a mountain top somewhere south of
During the checking of the ARRL SS CW logs, I found an interesting case that helps demonstrate why you should log dupes. WP3R had an interesting entry in his report file, where a QSO number was wrong
There was a request from one station for a minor rule change in the Stew Perry contest. The Boring ARC rules committee met this morning and agreed to the following change: All antennas used for trans