Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+Audio\s+Recordings\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: Larry K4AB <k4ab@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 09:55:41 -1000
I applaud CQWW for asking the top scoring guys to submit audio recordings in the upcoming WW contests. Wouldn't it be nice if those recordings could become public, much like the current Cabrillo file
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00044.html (7,315 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:46:22 -0500
Point of clarification. The CQWW rules ask top single operator entrants to make a recording of the contest. There is no need for them to submit the recording unless it is requested by the CQWW Commit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00051.html (8,711 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 15:50:58 -0400
To be clear, the requirement is not that the audio be submitted with the log, the requirement is that one be available and presented if asked by the committee within 90 days of the contest. These fil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00054.html (8,279 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: Ken Low <kenke3x@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:10:20 -0400
"I applaud CQWW for asking the top scoring guys to submit audio recordings in the upcoming WW contests. Wouldn't it be nice if those recordings could become public, much like the current Cabrillo fil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00055.html (8,200 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 16:13:46 -0500
I thought some of the auto recording programs made quite a small file, not even 10% of that size. Joe WB9SBD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00056.html (7,608 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: <dave@n1ix.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 18:59:06 -0400
The top QRP entry is not very interesting except maybe to a few QRPers. I will do my best to record the contest. I think the requirement is quite clear. If you expect to win you must record the entir
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00059.html (9,848 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:43:49 -0400
There is a great table comparing file sizes for various formats at <http://dsd-guide.com/size-comparison-chart-various-formats-dsd-wav-flac-mp3>. For our purposes, MP3 is surely adequate quality. 73,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00062.html (8,475 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 17:53:40 -0700
I record contests using the built in recorder in Writelog. Using the 8khz, stereo, 16 bit codec, the quality for both phone and cw is very good and 48 hours takes up under 5 gigs. I can burn all 48 h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00065.html (8,256 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Kinzli <kinzli@kinzlicoils.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 18:02:10 -0700
In previous 48 hour contests that I've recorded, a decent quality MP3 recording of the entire contest is on the order of 300MB, and could easily be cut back further with very little loss in quality/i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00066.html (10,087 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: VK4TS Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:38:12 +1000
I am surprised that N1MM have not reintroduced their own integrated recorder. Understand there was a glitch with a new version of windows that caused it to fail but like the Writelog recorder it was
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00069.html (9,496 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 07:51:28 +0200
+1 Olli Contest, DX & radio projects: http://www.dh8bqa.de Am 11.10.2015 um 03:38 schrieb VK4TS Trent Sampson: I am surprised that N1MM have not reintroduced their own integrated recorder. Understand
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00071.html (10,171 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:30:41 -0400
K3IT's free "qsorder" for N1MM & N1MM+ uses small .mp3 files & has worked well for many ops: http://sourceforge.net/projects/qsorder/files/ 73, Dave K3ZJ _____________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00076.html (11,584 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 05:15:52 +0700
I think the leaders should have to send in recording because a consistent rate of four-a-minute on phone is very dubious. However, it should be against the rules for the operators to LISTEN to their
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00078.html (13,029 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:06:48 -0400
If you mean four a minute consistent over the entire 48 hour contest, no one has ever done this. It is pretty easy to average four a minute over a number of hours. Some stations are running on two ba
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00080.html (8,623 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: VK4TS Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:28:21 +1000
The old N1MM Recorder would allow you to run through the log to any QSO and play it back as a simple function from within the N1MM Log ie select QSO call sign right click and play - To set up (from g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00082.html (12,911 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:33:18 -0400
Thatplayback convenience is still there, Trent. Setup is trivially more complicated, but scarcely rocket science. For that, see <http://n1mm.hamdocs.com/tiki-index.php?page=Third+Party+Software#QSOrd
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00086.html (13,443 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Audio Recordings (score: 1)
Author: VK4TS Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:03:50 +1000
OK I will give it another try - Last time I used it the interface was particularly clunky... Thanks Peter et al ... de 9M2/VK4TS AS 015 Penang Island Heading to 9M2M tomorrow Thatplayback convenience
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00092.html (14,967 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu