- 1. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Dordik <dordik@presov.viapvt.sk>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:53:26 +0100
- Kevin told us (several months ago), that upgrade from orinoco firmware (COR, ROR) to Karlnet Base and Satellite will be soon. I will be glad, if there will be upgrade for classic AP too (AP500, AP100
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00003.html (10,924 bytes)
- 2. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
- Author: "smyers" <wifiengineer@telsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:15:01 -0500
- My apologies, but I seem to be missing something. As of this writing, I have several "classic" pieces of hardware (serial 00-Ut, etc. indicates their manufacture was in 2000) running Karlnet's latest
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00004.html (11,803 bytes)
- 3. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
- Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 09:05:01 -0600
- All, What Peter is referring too is getting an upgrade from the COR/ROR version of our software. In the past, when we had a contract with Agere, we were prohibited from selling the upgrade. We are no
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00005.html (13,081 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:27:19 -0600
- Whoa....wait a minute..... You are telling me that I can now "upgrade" at the "upgrade" pricing, my COR/ROR units? I don't have to purchase the entire license? -bob
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00006.html (15,192 bytes)
- 5. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
- Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 09:32:31 -0600
- Bob, That is correct. We will have an announcement about this in the next week or so. We are just trying to get the paperwork issue figured out. I will post on this list when we have the details. Kev
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00007.html (16,239 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 09:22:52 -0600
- That is awesome. I've got about 5 COR's that I'd like to get to 4.31 or so. I'm having some latency issues with the second wireless interface and I've heard that the newer FW fixes it? thanks, Bob --
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00008.html (18,469 bytes)
- 7. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
- Author: "smyers" <wifiengineer@telsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:32:16 -0500
- I see about an average of 30 ms with 15 ROR (satellites) talking to 1 COR (base). The average is for all units total. 30% of them actually return a <10ms response! I am happy with this latency and am
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00009.html (19,485 bytes)
- 8. [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
- Author: Blair Drew Davis <theory@datawise.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:31:40 -0500
- Recently, with assistance from Ed at Karlnet, we found a work around for a for a latency and packet loss issue. We operate a geographically large wisp in Allegan, MI. We use Lucent hardware for our t
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00198.html (7,898 bytes)
- 9. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
- Author: "smyers" <wifiengineer@telsouth.net>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:23:18 -0500
- Good day to you. I have experience in the equipment you mention and can offer relation as way to help. I have a extremely similar network, with a piece of equipment running as a "COR master" (commonl
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00205.html (9,162 bytes)
- 10. Re: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:26:14 -0600
- I see high latency between the vendors implementations. ....in the range of 3 - 130ms.
- /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00206.html (10,330 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu